Black ice death willie lynch download

A gangsta hip-hop group formed by Iced-T and Black Silver, 4. A Hungarian rapper. A soul and funk unit from the US 6. A jug band from Kentucky, circa 7. There are more than one artist that use the name "Black Ice": 1. Similar Artists Play all.

Trending Tracks 1. Love this track. More Love this track Set track as current obsession Get track Loading. Friday 16 July Saturday 17 July Sunday 18 July Monday 19 July Tuesday 20 July Wednesday 21 July Thursday 22 July Friday 23 July Saturday 24 July Sunday 25 July Monday 26 July Tuesday 27 July Wednesday 28 July Thursday 29 July Friday 30 July Saturday 31 July Sunday 1 August Monday 2 August Tuesday 3 August Wednesday 4 August Thursday 5 August Friday 6 August Saturday 7 August Sunday 8 August Monday 9 August Tuesday 10 August Wednesday 11 August Thursday 12 August Friday 13 August Saturday 14 August Sunday 15 August Monday 16 August Tuesday 17 August Wednesday 18 August Thursday 19 August Friday 20 August Saturday 21 August Sunday 22 August Monday 23 August Tuesday 24 August Wednesday 25 August Thursday 26 August Friday 27 August Saturday 28 August Sunday 29 August Monday 30 August Tuesday 31 August Wednesday 1 September Thursday 2 September Friday 3 September Saturday 4 September Sunday 5 September Monday 6 September Tuesday 7 September Wednesday 8 September Thursday 9 September Friday 10 September Saturday 11 September Sunday 12 September Monday 13 September Tuesday 14 September Wednesday 15 September Thursday 16 September Friday 17 September Saturday 18 September Hardly had the sentences dried upon the statute-books before one Southern State after another raised the cry against "negro domination" and proclaimed there was an "unwritten law" that justified any means to resist it.

The method then inaugurated was the outrages by the "red-shirt" bands of Louisiana, South Carolina, and other Southern States, which were succeeded by the Ku-Klux Klans. These advocates of the "unwritten law" boldly avowed their purpose to intimidate, suppress, and nullify the negro's right to vote. In support of its plans the Ku-Klux Klans, the "red-shirt" and similar organizations proceeded to beat, exile, and kill negroes until the purpose of their organization was accomplished and the supremacy of the "unwritten law" was effected.

Thus lynchings began in the South, rapidly spreading into the various States until the national law was nullified and the reign of the "unwritten law" was supreme. Men were taken from their homes by "red-shirt" bands and stripped, beaten, and exiled; others were assassinated when their political prominence made them obnoxious to their political opponents; while the Ku-Klux barbarism of election days, reveling in the butchery of thousands of colored voters, furnished records in Congressional investigations that are a disgrace to civilization.

The alleged menace of universal suffrage having been avoided by the absolute suppression of the negro vote, the spirit of mob murder should have been satisfied and the butchery of negroes should have ceased.

But men, women, and children were the victims of murder by individuals and murder by mobs, just as they had been when killed at the demands of the "unwritten law" to prevent "negro domination. If a few barns were burned some colored man was killed to stop it. If a colored man resented the imposition of a white man and the two came to blows, the colored man had to die, either at the hands of the white man then and there or later at the hands of a mob that speedily gathered.

If he showed a spirit of courageous manhood he was hanged for his pains, and the killing was justified by the declaration that he was a "saucy nigger. In fact, for all kinds of offenses--and, for no offenses--from murders to misdemeanors, men and women are put to death without judge or jury; so that, although the political excuse was no longer necessary, the wholesale murder of human beings went on just the same.

A new name was given to the killings and a new excuse was invented for so doing. Again the aid of the "unwritten law" is invoked, and again it comes to the rescue. During the last ten years a new statute has been added to the "unwritten law. The result is that many men have been put to death whose innocence was afterward established; and to-day, under this reign of the "unwritten law," no colored man, no matter what his reputation, is safe from lynching if a white woman, no matter what her standing or motive, cares to charge him with insult or assault.

It is considered a sufficient excuse and reasonable justification to put a prisoner to death under this "unwritten law" for the frequently repeated charge that these lynching horrors are necessary to prevent crimes against women.

The sentiment of the country has been appealed to, in describing the isolated condition of white families in thickly populated negro districts; and the charge is made that these homes are in as great danger as if they were surrounded by wild beasts. And the world has accepted this theory without let or hindrance. In many cases there has been open expression that the fate meted out to the victim was only what he deserved.

In many other instances there has been a silence that says more forcibly than words can proclaim it that it is right and proper that a human being should be seized by a mob and burned to death upon the unsworn and the uncorroborated charge of his accuser.

No matter that our laws presume every man innocent until he is proved guilty; no matter that it leaves a certain class of individuals completely at the mercy of another class; no matter that it encourages those criminally disposed to blacken their faces and commit any crime in the calendar so long as they can throw suspicion on some negro, as is frequently done, and then lead a mob to take his life; no matter that mobs make a farce of the law and a mockery of justice; no matter that hundreds of boys are being hardened in crime and schooled in vice by the repetition of such scenes before their eyes--if a white woman declares herself insulted or assaulted, some life must pay the penalty, with all the horrors of the Spanish Inquisition and all the barbarism of the Middle Ages.

The world looks on and says it is well. Not only are two hundred men and women put to death annually, on the average, in this country by mobs, but these lives are taken with the greatest publicity. In many instances the leading citizens aid and abet by their presence when they do not participate, and the leading journals inflame the public mind to the lynching point with scare-head articles and offers of rewards. Whenever a burning is advertised to take place, the railroads run excursions, photographs are taken, and the same jubilee is indulged in that characterized the public hangings of one hundred years ago.

There is, however, this difference: in those old days the multitude that stood by was permitted only to guy or jeer. The nineteenth century lynching mob cuts off ears, toes, and fingers, strips off flesh, and distributes portions of the body as souvenirs among the crowd. If the leaders of the mob are so minded, coal-oil is poured over the body and the victim is then roasted to death.

This has been done in Texarkana and Paris, Tex. In Paris the officers of the law delivered the prisoner to the mob. The mayor gave the school children a holiday and the railroads ran excursion trains so that the people might see a human being burned to death. In Texarkana, the year before, men and boys amused themselves by cutting off strips of flesh and thrusting knives into their helpless victim. At Newman, Ga.

But their trouble was all in vain--he never uttered a cry, and they could not make him confess. This condition of affairs were brutal enough and horrible enough if it were true that lynchings occurred only because of the commission of crimes against women--as is constantly declared by ministers, editors, lawyers, teachers, statesmen, and even by women themselves.

It has been to the interest of those who did the lynching to blacken the good name of the helpless and defenseless victims of their hate. For this reason they publish at every possible opportunity this excuse for lynching, hoping thereby not only to palliate their own crime but at the same time to prove the negro a moral monster and unworthy of the respect and sympathy of the civilized world.

But this alleged reason adds to the deliberate injustice of the mob's work. Instead of lynchings being caused by assaults upon women, the statistics show that not one-third of the victims of lynchings are even charged with such crimes. The Chicago Tribune, which publishes annually lynching statistics, is authority for the following: In , when lynching reached high-water mark, there were persons lynched.

The entire number is divided among the following States: Alabama Five of this number were females. The charges for which they were lynched cover a wide range. They are as follows: Rape His fourteen-year-old daughter and sixteen-year-old son were hanged and their bodies filled with bullets; then the father was also lynched.

This occurred in November, , at Jonesville, La. Indeed, the record for the last twenty years shows exactly the same or a smaller proportion who have been charged with this horrible crime. Quite a number of the one-third alleged cases of assault that have been personally investigated by the writer have shown that there was no foundation in fact for the charges; yet the claim is not made that there were no real culprits among them.

The negro has been too long associated with the white man not to have copied his vices as well as his virtues. But the negro resents and utterly repudiates the efforts to blacken his good name by asserting that assaults upon women are peculiar to his race. The negro has suffered far more from the commission of this crime against the women of his race by white men than the white race has ever suffered through his crimes.

Very scant notice is taken of the matter when this is the condition of affairs. What becomes a crime deserving capital punishment when the tables are turned is a matter of small moment when the negro woman is the accusing party. But since the world has accepted this false and unjust statement, and the burden of proof has been placed upon the negro to vindicate his race, he is taking steps to do so. The Anti-Lynching Bureau of the National Afro-American Council is arranging to have every lynching investigated and publish the facts to the world, as has been done in the case of Sam Hose, who was burned alive last April at Newman, Ga.

The detective's report showed that Hose killed Cranford, his employer, in self-defense, and that, while a mob was organizing to hunt Hose to punish him for killing a white man, not till twenty-four hours after the murder was the charge of rape, embellished with psychological and physical impossibilities, circulated. Of five hundred newspaper clippings of that horrible affair, nine-tenths of them assumed Hose's guilt--simply because his murderers said so, and because it is the fashion to believe the negro peculiarly addicted to this species of crime.

All the negro asks is justice--a fair and impartial trial in the courts of the country. That given, he will abide the result. But this question affects the entire American nation, and from several points of view: First, on the ground of consistency. Our watchword has been "the land of the free and the home of the brave. Neither do brave men or women stand by and see such things done without compunction of conscience, nor read of them without protest.

Our nation has been active and outspoken in its endeavors to right the wrongs of the Armenian Christian, the Russian Jew, the Irish Home Ruler, the native women of India, the Siberian exile, and the Cuban patriot. Surely it should be the nation's duty to correct its own evils! Second, on the ground of economy. To those who fail to be convinced from any other point of view touching this momentous question, a consideration of the economic phase might not be amiss.

It is generally known that mobs in Louisiana, Colorado, Wyoming, and other States have lynched subjects of other countries. When their different governments demanded satisfaction, our country was forced to confess her inability to protect said subjects in the several States because of our State-rights doctrines, or in turn demand punishment of the lynchers.

This confession, while humiliating in the extreme, was not satisfactory; and, while the United States cannot protect, she can pay.

This she has done, and it is certain will have to do again in the case of the recent lynching of Italians in Louisiana. The United States already has paid in indemnities for lynching nearly a half million dollars, as follows: Paid China for Rock Springs Wyo.

No scoffer at our boasted American civilization could say anything more harsh of it than does the American white man himself who says he is unable to protect the honor of his women without resort to such brutal, inhuman, and degrading exhibitions as characterize "lynching bees. The red Indian of the Western plains tied his prisoner to the stake, tortured him, and danced in fiendish glee while his victim writhed in the flames. His savage, untutored mind suggested no better way than that of wreaking vengeance upon those who had wronged him.

These people knew nothing about Christianity and did not profess to follow its teachings; but such primary laws as they had they lived up to.

No nation, savage or civilized, save only the United States of America, has confessed its inability to protect its women save by hanging, shooting, and burning alleged offenders. Finally, for love of country. No American travels abroad without blushing for shame for his country on this subject. And whatever the excuse that passes current in the United States, it avails nothing abroad. With all the powers of government in control; with all laws made by white men, administered by white judges, jurors, prosecuting attorneys, and sheriffs; with every office of the executive department filled by white men--no excuse can be offered for exchanging the orderly administration of justice for barbarous lynchings and "unwritten laws.

This cannot be until Americans of every section, of broadest patriotism and best and wisest citizenship, not only see the defect in our country's armor but take the necessary steps to remedy it. Although lynchings have steadily increased in number and barbarity during the last twenty years, there has been no single effort put forth by the many moral and philanthropic forces of the country to put a stop to this wholesale slaughter.

Indeed, the silence and seeming condonation grow more marked as the years go by. A few months ago the conscience of this country was shocked because, after a two-weeks trial, a French judicial tribunal pronounced Captain Dreyfus guilty. And yet, in our own land and under our own flag, the writer can give day and detail of one thousand men, women, and children who during the last six years were put to death without trial before any tribunal on earth.

Humiliating indeed, but altogether unanswerable, was the reply of the French press to our protest: "Stop your lynchings at home before you send your protests abroad.

He was the colonel of a regiment of riflemen that behaved with gallantry at Guilford. The term "lynch law" is said to have been derived from his practice of executing without trial the members of a band of Tory marauders that infested the newly settled country.

Another account derives the term from the summary methods taken by a planter named John Lynch to rid the region of outlaws and escaped slaves who took refuge in the Dismal Swamp. This may have been Colonel Charles's brother John, who founded the town of Lynchburg.

A tradition of the Drake family of North Carolina ascribes the phrase to the precipitate hanging, to prevent a rescue, of a Tory named Major Beard on Lynch creek in Franklin county, North Carolina When it was found that the Tories were not in pursuit, the captors went through the forms of a court-martial, and hanged the lifeless body in execution of its decree. E EgbertSouse A4. And I catch "the whiff" of a bunch of modern negroes who should know better being duped.

Though, this time, not by whitey! Our current dialect of English is not a "dumbed-down" version of that spoken years ago, and any linguist would have a lard time accepting what is written in that letter as anything but a forgery.

I did not state that the language of years ago is similar to current american english. In fact, I stated that even slaves wrote in a more artistic and formal manner.

But, since forgery would inheirantly be a "copy" of an original, wouldn't a historical linguist have to call this a work of fiction? What I find interesting is that you and Rage and others seem to have accepted the sentiment of the Letter so completely that you are more concerned about defending it than you are about the fact that you are being lied to, and are even complicit in the lie.

Please state segments of my reply which appear to be defending the linguistic validity of the willie lynch letter? All oppressed cultures have literature which is historical, or political propaganda, or fiction based on actual events. Who gave the edict that materials meant to spur thought, conversation, and interest in the effects of slavery must be reflective of historical events only? A large body of fiction, some award winning, surrounds the jewish holocaust.

It serves to keep people aware of the horrors. It would be obsurd to tell readers that they must only read historical accounts of the atrocities committed against jews. It is obsurd to imply the same about literature concerning atrocities committed against africans. You do realize that I have not asserted that the letter was written in 18th century virginia?

I have indeed, however, asserted that the intent or the sentiment of the letter is more important than when it was written.

Is that the premise you are challenging? ThaWatcher A2. The Willie Lynch letter is right up there with the Maya Angelou poem about clothes Hi Negrospiritual, see what a imbecillic, moronic, parasitical twit you are dealing with? Why bother wasting intelligence on utter ignorance. What is NOT fake is the blood of the many lynched, tortured, violated, enslaved, segregated, discriminated against BLACKS who these 'yessum white massa yaws right we coloreds be bad' psychoes are trampling by their subservient disposition.

It was this statement: "I doubt that most americans at that time spoke and wrote in the same manner as Adams,Johnson, and Dafoe. After Melesi made the argument that the language of the letter was wrong for the time, you offered that it was possible that much of the populace was semi-literate in what appeared to be an explanation for the incongruence. My reply was to tell you that the language of today is not the equivalent of the semi-literate or informal speech of years ago.

Are you implying that the stories of the holocaust are fiction? Because that's the comparison you are making.

Fictionalized accounts based on history are one thing, but the Letter is trying to pass as fact. The only reason it was ever circulated was to convince people that it really happened. Fiction like "The Color Purple" and "Gone with the Wind" are not real history and they don't pretend to be.

The same cannot be said of the Lynch Letter, and that's the problem. If it were just an exerpt from a novel someone was writing, we wouldn't be having this conversation, but as long as people are passing it off as fact, somebody is going to challenge it.

If you don't understand my reasoning for doing so, I'd suggest you reread my earlier posts. Disobey and you will be punished, and you will be severely punished, maybe death. In the ante-bellum South, most slave owners were ruthless and selfish. If a slave were to miss his or her appointed workload, they would face a whipping, or another similar punishment.

In the slave owner's mind a slave was nothing more that an animal the can walk upright, and talk, something not deserving of human kindness. Instead they were doomed to live life like animals. Work or punishment where the only choices they knew. Life for the salves consisted of nothing but work, pain and fear. The reasons for being punished were many, "A mere look, or motion, -- a mistake, accident, or want of power, -- are all matters for which a slave must be whipped at any time.

Does a slave look dissatisfied? It is said, he has the devil in him, and it must be whipped out. Does he speak loudly when spoken to by his master? Then he is getting high-minded, and should be taken a buttonhole lower. Does he forget to pull off his hat at the approach of a white person?

That he is wanting reverences, and should be whipped for it. Does he ever venture to vindicate his conduct, when censured for it? Then he is guilty of imprudence, --one of the greatest crimes of which a slave can be guilty Does he ever venture to suggest a different mode of doing things from that pointed out by his master?

He is indeed presumptuous, and getting above himself William Wells Brown remembers a punishment that his master used to call " Virginia Play". This consisted of tying up the slave in the smokehouse, and whipping them. After that was done he would cause a fire to be made of tobacco stems, and smoke them.

Other punishments consisted of fasting their already malnutritioned slaves for excessive amounts of time. Making them work continuously for days without food or rest. Another form of torture used was to strip the slave naked hang them and have each male member of the family whip the slave fifty times. As if this sort of humiliation and excruciating pain wasn't enough, the punishments became worse.

Another reason for punishment, if not the worst, is attempting to run away. John Brown explains how he had been punished " Stevens fixed bells and horns on my head.

This is not by any means an uncommon punishment. A circle of iron, having a hinge behind, with a staple and a padlock before, which hang under the chin, is fastened around the neck. Another circle of iron fits quite close round the crown of the head.

The two are held together in this position by three rods of iron, which are fixed in each circle. These rod, or horns, stick out three feet above the head, and have a bell attached to each.

The bell and horns do not weigh less that twelve to fourteen pounds. When Stevens had fixed this ornament on my head, he turned me loose, and told me I might run off now if I liked". Brown goes on to explain how he wore the bell and horns day and night for three months. The weight of the mask made it almost impossible and very painful to stoop and work. The horns prevented him from stretching himself, or even curl himself up, which obligated him to sleep crouching.

Brown Another example of the severity of punishments was Moses Roper's experiences after his many attempts of running away. Among the instruments used to torture he describes one By it he hung me up by the hands, a horse, and at times, a man moving round the screw and carrying it up and down, and pressing the block into a box into which cotton is put.

At this time he hung me up for a quarter of an hour. I was carried up ten feet from the ground When he came back, the first thing he did was pour tar upon my head, the rubbed it all over my face, took a torch with pitch on, and set it on fire: he put it out before it did me very great injury, but the pain which I endured was the most excruciating, nearly all my hair been burnt off. The more the masters would punish the slaves the more willing they were to endure more just for a chance to escape.

According to the slave owners, the slaves were the ignorant ones, but in reality the slave owners were the ignorant ones because they could have had better working slaves and actually ended up being less of an expense, if they would have keep somewhat happy and healthy slave. Let me ask you something, rage. If a white man drove into an urban neighborhood that was known for crime and later invented a story about being carjacked when nothing really happened, is he lying?

If the neighborhood is already known to have a high crime rate, is the story necessary to raise awareness? Does the fact of real carjackings make it acceptable for anyone who feels threatened to lie for dramatic effect?

Is he entitled to this lie, or is he just an overzealous fool? I appreciate that the author of the Letter is trying to unite the descendants of slaves, and that's great, but he could at least have gone to the library and given us something legitimate. We deserve that much. Making something like that up is the definition of laziness when there is so much real information already out there. I guess he or she just wanted something inflammatory without stopping to read about it, so in a way it's fitting that so many of you accept it as fact without stopping to think about it.

At any rate, what you put in your head is your business. Knock yourself out. You presented the letter as true. It is not. Like so many others of your offerings, it is a hoax, and an unnecessary one at that.

Therefore your defense, that it doesn't matter, since the writer was presenting a "mild version of the truth" is hogwash. It is a lie, and now that you have been cought dealing in lies again, you are backtracking and backpedaling, hoping that no one will remember that, once again, you are foisting on everybody else a lie. Now, don't twist my words again and try to make me out to be defending white crimes in slavery. I am not and never will. I had a great uncle who was lynched in the South.

I am not likely to forget that nor to defend what led to his death. But I will not speak against racism by using lies, no matter how often you do and yet defend your wrong actions every time you do. The truth is enough. Let's confine ourselves to that. I will not engage in inane banter about the vernacular of the willie lynch letter posted by ProphetessofRage. She did not write the letter. The behavior described within it did exist. The willie lynch letter is in no way harmful to black people, just as the large body of fictional works including plays, films, books, music and art exhibits loosely based on the holocaust is in no way harmful to jews.

If One asserts that the Willie Lynch letter is harmful to blacks then one must prove that the daily deluge of holocaust or concentration camp related fictional accounts are in some way harmful to jews. From Dec 21 quote: What you fail to see is that the valid accusations of oppression and mental subjugation are only trivialized when they are represented by an outright lie.

And for the last time, fictional accounts of the Holocaust cannot be compared to the Lynch Letter because the Lynch letter is not presented as fiction, it's presented as history, which makes it a fake. I don't have the energy to explain the difference to you, so you might want to ask somebody. James Wesley Chester A1. What do we choose to "argue" about. Was Willie Lynch real? Was his highly quoted "letter" real?

If it was, was it a letter or a speech? Stangely, we all seem to agree that what is reputed to have been said is real. It is important to know the fiction, or reality, of the actual document. It is far more important to know the fiction or reality of the content of the document.

Could it be that "lynching" as a name for the act of killings African Americans, derives from the content, the philosophy, of the document. The argument over authenticity seems like academic minutia in the larger context of things important to African America.

Your children are who you say you are. I don't think it matters whether the letter is real or not, like you said, what matters is that what the letter proclaims was and is real. However, I must add that I am still searching for where I first read this "Lynch" speech, because what I recall was reading something that was not written in modern language and that it was a speech, not ever a letter.

MANIA your commentary towards this issue is in a word, ludicrous. Indeed, you must be on some deep psychotic medication over the many, many, many, ad infinitium many lies WHITES told in their history books concerning slavery. The lie that professes George Washington, Patrick Henry, and a host of other of your flounding fathers were noble Christians, when in reality they were rapists, adulterers, enslaving satanists.

It must incense you that in this 21st century millinieum ending year of , that those white lies are still bred in every white school, and church. Well, the fact is, I could go on and on, with regard to how you must be a MANIAC MANIA, over the on-going Lies and deceits that whites bred one generation after another to adhere to but having with your own words displayed your mania over the written lies on enslavement I'll not stir up the rage in you mania.

It seems you've flipped out to the point that what you are saying is, you despise styles of writings even if what is said is the TRUTH such as the remarkable Willie Lynch writings.

First I shall teach you that there are all types of trutful writings on the enslavement. There is poetry, dramitists, prose, biographical, autobiographical, composition, research, etc. You see the horror of enslavement was so that it can, must, should, and is written about in a variety of styles and all of it is acceptable and good.

It is no more a 'hoax' than any style of truthful writings on the demonic savagery of whites. And, that segments of coloreds still act on to this very day. Willie Lynch is the perfect writing to use to heal that which was bruised by whites.

To unite that which was divided by whites. Essence, April, , by Leonard A. Slade for Elizabeth Langford Slade Picking cotton on a cold day blisters decorated her black fingers in the fields She crawled on her knees until the sun bowed to her. Eight children planted beneath the stars The earth felt good to her. You can see how now a parched face and folded hands she kneels in a different place drinking blood and eating bread at the altar Comforted white gloves feel good to her waving to touch the sky hymns fill the air They feel good to her they feel good to her "Mother Africa" and "The Black Madonna" reprinted from the book Elisabeth and Other Poems, published by The McGraw-Hill Companies.

I am weary, weary O! All on that charming coast is no bitter snow and frost, Like the lands of Virginia-ginia O; There streams for ever flow, and there flowers for ever blow, And alas! Men from England bought and sold me, Paid my price in paltry gold; But, though slave they have enrolled me, Minds are never to be sold.

Still in thought as free as ever, What are England's rights, I ask, Me from my delights to sever, Me to torture, me to task? Fleecy locks and black complexion Cannot forfeit nature's claim; Skins may differ, but affection Dwells in white and black the same. Why did all-creating nature Make the plant for which we toil? Sighs must fan it, tears must water, Sweat of ours must dress the soil. Think, ye masters iron-hearted, Lolling at your jovial boards, Think how many backs have smarted For the sweets your cane affords.

Is there, as ye sometimes tell us, Is there One who reigns on high? Has He bid you buy and sell us, Speaking from his throne, the sky? Ask him, if your knotted scourges, Matches, blood-extorting screws, Are the means that duty urges Agents of his will to use? He answers! He, foreseeing what vexations Afric's sons should undergo, Fixed their tyrants' habitations Where his whirlwinds answer--"No. Slaves of gold, whose sordid dealings Tarnish all your boasted powers, Prove that you have human feelings, Ere you proudly question ours!

I dream'd that on Ocean afloat Far hence to the westward I sail'd, While the billows high-lifted the boat, And the fresh-blowing breeze never fail'd.

In the steerage a woman I saw, Such at least was the form that she wore Whose beauty impress'd me with awe Ne'er taught me by woman before. Some clouds which had over us hung Fled chased by her melody clear, And methought while she Liberty sung 'Twas Liberty only to hear. Thus swiftly dividing the flood To a slave-cultur'd island we came, Where a daemon, her enemy, stood, Oppression his terrible name. In his hand, as the sign of his sway, A scourge hung with lashes he bore, And stood looking out for his prey, From Africa's sorrowful shore.

But soon as approaching the land That goddess-like Woman he view'd, The scourge he let fall from his hand With blood of his subjects imbrued; I saw him both sicken and die, And the moment the monster expired Heard shouts that ascended the sky From thousands with rapture inspired. Awaking, how could I but muse On what such a Dream might betide? But ah! For oh! So this is my song, as I told you before; Come, buy off my stock, for I must no more Carry Caesars and Pompeys to Sugar-cane shore, Which nobody can deny, deny, Which nobody can deny.

It's also goes like this, that demonic confederate flag will come down off of federal buildings so the black tax dollar portion no longer has to pay for it to fly there. Finally, the words go, when they take that damnable enemy flag down, as you slither back under that rock take that flag pole and stick it up your The End!

Now, why do you suppose that you were asked if you knew the words to "Dixie"? But you wouldn't ask yourself that. Instead you will have a fit. Not very convincing, especially when you completely ignore the imporant point--that you have tried to redundantly bolster a well-known point with a lie. We don't need the speech or letter. Moreover we shouldn't use the Lynch speech or letter because it is a lie.

Using lies to make our point only weakens it. The point of this thread is simply, "Stick to the truth. It's far stronger than any lie can be. If it's the content we're concerned about, then speak of that content without relying on a false letter. We have enough information on the treatment of slaves to make our point about slavery without dragging in something that everybody knows is wrong.

The point is not an informational one. It's a moral one, and therefore just as important. In this case, it's more important. Stay on the side of the morally right and speak the truth, and then we'll be listened to. But if we use a lie, we deserve to be ignored. It's obvious that you're obsessed with speaking to me even though I've repeatedly told your not bright by any stretch of the imagination carcass that I don't want to talk to such a one as you. Still, you're a sick puppy ever sniffing at my backside and that's well, for one thing, darn funny, and for another, proof of you and your fellow slime's insanity, not that it hasn't been obvious from day one.

None the less, power to Willie Lynch truth! Everybody say it, power to Willie Lynch truth! Hey, it's the last day of the year and I know you'll be thrilled and by reason of your obsession over me, probably sickily heated up, you pervert because I had mercy on a twit like you and graced you with my response.

The Path 2. The Ugly Show 3. A Dream Transferred 4. Find My Way Home 5. Lone Soldier feat. Chyna Black 6. Musiq 7. Nice2MeetU feat.

Vee 8. Front Page Rain, Hail, Sleet or Snow feat.